That’s right, for Lent I am giving up the Catholic Church. I need a break from all this. After serious consideration, and yes, prayer, I have decided that I need some distance. Whether I return is uncertain. I love the liturgical life of the Church, and I believe in the Sacraments, the Eucharist, etc, as well as the more mystical aspects of the religion, but so many other things are so troubling to me at the moment that I need to step back. My mind and soul do not need these conflicts right now.
Why am I distancing myself? Well, there are different reasons. The first is I simply do not believe in all that Church teaches. So why should I belong? I strongly disagree with the Church’s teaching on issues such as homosexuality, contraception, etc. I do not consider them sins. Belonging to an institution which says that those who act out on their same sex attractions are engaging in some sort of moral evil is not where I really want to belong. I know many practicing gay people, some of them in my own family, and I will not think of them as evil or morally disordered because of their sexual practices, their need to experience love with others in their own way. In the end, the Catholic Church perpetuates hatred and bigotry towards gays by its teachings on homosexuality. I do not see this as peripheral issue that can simply be ignored.
The rise of politicians such as Rick Santorum have also contributed to my alienation from the Church. I cannot listen to what he says and say to myself, I belong to same religion as this man. Having listened to his sort of Catholicism my entire life, I can no longer accept it. Whether we like it or not, Santorum does represent the teachings of the Church on these social issues. He is a true believer. Then, to see so many Evangelicals and Catholics openly question Obama’s Christian faith makes me realize how small minded and bigoted so many of these people are. If someone does not belong to their brand of Christianity, their very Christianity is questioned. Unfortunately this is as old as Christianity itself. It is particularly rife in more traditionally minded Catholic groups. In a larger political context, I cannot stand the Republican party, conservatives, or anything associated with them any longer. They are the greatest threat to freedom in our country, and they are being driven by religious fundamentalists, many of them Christian or Catholic, who want to create some sort of religious utopia or theocracy in this country. If this sounds extreme, I am planning some more post on this which show the facts of what the religious fundies think.

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, another holy Christian warrior who wanted to enact state sponsored rape with forced vaginal probes of immoral, whorish women seeking abortions.
Really, there is not a whole lot of difference between American conservative Christians and Islamic fundamentalists: they both want to impose “God’s laws and rules” on the society around them. The GOP is turning into the American version of the Taliban. For instance, Republican Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell is a good example of this American Taliban. He is a good, pure, morally upright Christian who wants to punish fornicators and other morally deviant people, the sort of thing they do in Afghanistan or Iran. He once wrote in a 1989 Thesis for Regent University, televangelist Pat Robinson’s madras, The Republican Party’s Vision for the Family: The Compelling Issue of The Decade.: “Government policy should favor married couples over ‘cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators” He also said: “Man’s basic nature is inclined towards evil, and when the exercise of liberty takes the shape of pornography, drug abuse, or homosexuality, the government must restrain, punish, and deter.” This would be consistent with traditional Christian and Catholic teaching. Therefore, in the political reality of the world, he and his kind want to punish me for fucking women. I say to him and his ilk, fuck off. I will oppose you forever.
To belong to a group, it is essential that you feel some sort of fundamental connection with the members of that group. There needs to be some commonality. To a large degree, I no longer feel that with Catholicism. As the Church is presently structured, the strict orthodoxy promulgated on a daily basis through official Church organs, or through the Catholic media, is driving me away from God. I find it is now damaging my faith. I simply do not believe in many of the moral precepts any longer. I actually never did: I just told myself because I thought if I did not, God would punish me with eternal damnation. I was told I needed to believe in the Magisterium of the Church, that God speaks though them, if I want to save my soul, or feel close to God, even though many of those same teachings were antithetical to my basic nature. This created a sort of schizophrenic spiritual and psychological nature inside of me, which I now need to be free off. There is much more to this than I care to ever write about, so I will leave it at that.

The holy crusaders hate all forms of eroticism, especially female nudity. It makes them think naughty thoughts. Imagine!
Finally, my experiences on the Catholic and Christian blogosphere have been enlightening. The vitriol and hatred I have seen expressed on many traditionalist Catholic blogs, or other Christian blogs, towards those who do not agree with all Church teachings, or question certain things, made me realize that I have very little, if anything, in common with most of the those who seriously practice the faith. In a sense, when it comes to me I cannot deny their logic: my writings, my advocacy of sexual and erotic themes, is anathema to traditional Christian teaching. There is no way around that and for me it is a tension that has become too great. But even more than the sexual issues, it is the anger and hatred of so many Christians that so disturbs me. I think for a lot of the general populace out there, Christianity is now beginning to be seen as a religion of hatred and intolerance, thanks to the likes of Santorum and Franklin Graham, among others. Many of the comments I have received on this blog concerning my religious questions, even though I do try to spell them out, are amazingly hostile and vindictive. Some of them I merely delete, because I do not want my comment section turning into a hatefest, nor do I want to participate in that. I have better things to do. This blog, in the end, was always meant to be a pleasurable exploration into sexuality and spirituality, not a slugfest on theology, although certainly many of my posts have dealt with controversial issues, and I know they will elicit such responses. But still, I try to be light hearted about things. Many holy Christians find this to be purely evil and utterly intolerable. My most recent post on this is a good example of how seriously maladjusted some in the Christian world are. If that is who they are fine, but I do not want to be associated with them.
Many of the people in the Catholic or Christian blogging world are recent converts. For me, I have spent my entire life within the Catholic Church. Even though I have met many wonderful people, and made lifelong friends, I cannot even begin to count the number of strident, hate filled people I have come across in my time, who, in the name of a cold theology, see the world in a certain way, and expect everyone else to follow “the rules”, and if they don’t, they are wrong, evil, condemned to hell, etc. For the recent convert, the Church is a wonderfully structured place, an almost abstract ideal put into physical form. Catholicism in particular is a religion of rules and regulations. But I am not a rule oriented person. I hate rules. I like to break them when I can. I really don’t like being told how or what to think or believe. The vast majority of the true, orthodox believers tend to be the rule oriented types: they easily accept what they are told, do not question it, and fall into line. They often fall into certain professions, such as accountants, engineers, military types, etc, the professions that tend to require a certain structured, linear way of thinking. Obeying is easy. In return they receive a certain sense of stability and continuity. For them, safe in the bosom of Holy Mother Church, the world is indeed ordered and harmonious. Again, if this works for them, all the better, for them. But I am not like this. I can’t help question things. Call it pride or whatever. But the bottom line is that I do not feel a connection any longer with the people or the institution to which I belong. So why belong?
This does not mean that I no longer believe in God. Christianity on the whole has been a great force for good in the world. It continues to do many good and great things. I just can’t stand conservative, holy orthodox Christians anymore. So, I may have to go back to my own culture’s ancient religious roots, such as the Olympian gods or something of that sort. After all, I am quite the devotee of Venus, as my blog demonstrates. As Cartman from South Park says, “Screw you guys, I’m going home.”


Butterfly Flower said:
*hugs you*
I know what you’re going through. I dealt with all these feelings last summer.
Doesn’t it feel like your faith was stolen? I was a cradle Catholic, I went to Catholic school, I believed. Yet when I needed my faith the most, I kept clashing with crazy-hateful Catholics IRL & online.
It’s not fair. Why did “People of the Lie” [seriously, you need to check out that book] have to flock to the Catholic Church and ruin my religion? Why did they have to hurt me?
I have a collection of Catholic jewelry. I put it all in a drawer. For months, I couldn’t look at the jewelry without feeling a mixture of sadness, longing, and anger. I’m not sure if these feelings will ever go away completely.
But even more than the sexual issues, it is the anger and hatred of so many Christians that so disturbs me. I think for a lot of the general populace out there, Christianity is now beginning to be seen as a religion of hatred and intolerance, thanks to the likes of Santorum and Franklin Graham, among others. Many of the comments I have received on this blog concerning my religious questions, even though I do try to spell them out, are amazingly hostile and vindictive.
I can’t believe some of the horrible, evil things said to me by devout Christians on the blogosphere [I'm an engaged Christian virgin waiting until marriage - but I'm evil and deserve to be cyberbullied because I converted to my fiance's Anglican Church. Apparently the Jesus Anglicans believe in isn't the "real" Jesus.]
& when the hatred happens to you IRL, it’s so much worse. How could someone walk out of church, then tell a fellow Christian that their inherited childhood illness is the result of sin?
I sin. I doubt. My father is a pagan as well as a Freemason [double the evil!]. Yet I would never consider doing what some of these devout Christians have done to me. How twisted are their souls, that they think it’s perfectly acceptable to use the word of the Lord to hurt others? Why are they so pleased that their behavior pushes people away from Christ?
The scary thing is, I really don’t think these people are genuine Christians. I think they only became Christians as an excuse to act better than others/to be hateful. Christianity is a masquerade to them, they don’t really believe in Christ’s word. That’s why they focus so much on the physical aspects [praying, going to church, baking Saint cakes, etc.] They’re not interested in changing their behavior to act like genuinely decent people; they just want to appear to be genuinely decent people. I mean, if they read the Bible as much as they claim to, then they should have realized long ago that they behave exactly like Pharisees [i.e. hateful legalists]. Long story short: according to Jesus himself, they’re all going to burn in Hell .
I need to send you an except from the book “Grand Theft Jesus”. The author re-wrote the Beatitudes to fit the behavior of modern hateful Right-Wingers. Here’s a few of them:
“Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for domination, for they shall be satisfied”
“Blessed are the haughty in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven”
I wonder how many modern devout Christians behave exactly opposite to the Beatitudes?
*lights a cigarette*
I wish you the best of luck. I know it’s insanely hard, but don’t let the hate get to you. Laugh about it; rejoice in the irony of knowing that all the hateful Christians you encounter will have some rather grievous sins to answer for on their judgement day.
God reviewing Racer X: “I see you indulged excessively in sexual pleasures…”
God reviewing Hateful Christians: “I see you pushed fellow Christians away from me”
I wonder which sin God would be more pissed about?
Butterfly Flower said:
[just remembered] Racer X, this book might help you http://www.amazon.com/unChristian-Generation-Really-Christianity-Matters/dp/0801013003/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1330223906&sr=1-1
If you want, I can email you a list of books that could help you with your Christianity issues.
imnobody said:
Butterfly, why don’t you put this list here so everybody who is interested has access to them?
OffTheCuff said:
Does this mean you’re back in when Lent is over?
Congrats on your apostasy. I don’t see them as hating you so much, as challenging the consistency of your beleifs – which I pinged you on a bit on.
Weclome to actually practicing what you preach. Personally, I’d rather than deal with an honest heathen than a hypocrite – the latter are easy to spot when they show no remorse (repentance) for past sin, which eventually slips out. That means their moral code amounts to “have your cake and eat it too”.
Racer X said:
Butterfly,
Thanks for the encouragement. I still believe in God, I am just not going to let other people tell me what and what not to believe.
I can understand the contradictions that my writings present to others, but what always amazes me is the complete animus and hatred that Christians often direct to those who are not like them, or disagree with their vision of Christ. It is quite amusing! I am sorry though to here about your confrontations with people in this area.
I think I might explore Neoplatonism.
Racer X said:
Off the cuff
“Personally, I’d rather than deal with an honest heathen than a hypocrite”
I agree.
What I believe is what I believe anyone who does not like it can go fuck themselves. I got tired of the cult like orthodoxy that so many Xtians embrace. I need to think for myself.
It’s a alpha trait, btw, not being afraid to think for oneself. Lets face it, most Christian men are betas, who love to follow rules, submit to authority, white knight women, and live in a fantasy land of female dominated religious institutions. The Catholic Church is run by mostly old closeted homosexual clergy and grannies. Most men do not find this attractive.
anonymous x said:
For the haters:
Luke 19
Luke 6:36-38
Acts 10:34
Butterfly Flower said:
@Anonymous X:
Scripture doesn’t work on hateful Christians, trust me – I’ve tried it. Like I said before, they aren’t genuine Christians. The Bible is merely a tool they use to justify malicious behavior.
For example, they have no problem using Leviticus 20:13 to justify Homophobia, yet scoff at Leviticus 19:19 – which states that it’s a sin to wear mixed-fiber clothing [i.e. wearing a cheap cotton-blend T-shirt from Walmart qualifies as a sin].
Besides, even if we were to judge Racer X using the Bible – the sinfulness of his sexual shenanigans is up in the air. The Catholic Church burned the Gospel of Eve – the gospel where God himself gave a big thumbs up to Free Love.
@I’mnobody:
I didn’t want to include too many links, because then my comment would be labeled as spam.
The list is long & my memory is a bit foggy – I’ll have to work on it.
@Racer X:
If you want, I can send you some literature [ebooks] on Shintoism. It sounds like a faith you’d enjoy.
Nature is a divine gift from the Kami. There’s nothing sinful about enjoying the pleasures of sex. Basically, as long as you respect others and do not go around committing intentional harm – you’re pretty much cool.
zhai2nan2 said:
‘I know many practicing gay people, some of them in my own family, and I will not think of them as evil or morally disordered because of their sexual practices, their need to experience love with others in their own way.’
From what I can observe, it seems that gay people do not choose their sexual preference.
The Catholic Church does not say the preference is a sin – it says that acting on the preference is a sin!
I don’t necessarily think that gay people are evil just because they’re gay. Of course, many gay people are genuinely evil because their selfishness is out of control and hurts other people.
However, assume that we could separate out the evil gays from the non-evil gays. Would we be able to build a society where the gay way and the straight way could co-exist? I doubt it, but if you want to build such a society, I’m not going to try to stop you.
Racer X said:
“The Catholic Church does not say the preference is a sin – it says that acting on the preference is a sin!”
The problem is that you cannot condemn a person to a lifetime of involuntary celibacy. That is what the Catholic Church wants to do with gay people. It says, you can be gay, just not act on it.
Racer X said:
Butterfly,
“f you want, I can send you some literature [ebooks] on Shintoism. It sounds like a faith you’d enjoy.”
Sure, send me something. Online links would be good too.
“Nature is a divine gift from the Kami. There’s nothing sinful about enjoying the pleasures of sex. Basically, as long as you respect others and do not go around committing intentional harm – you’re pretty much cool.”
Sounds more to my liking than the dark, ominous tone of so much of Christian theology regarding sex and sexuality. I like the idea of there being nothing sinful about enjoying the pleasures of sex.
After all, why should it be sinful???
zhai2nan2 said:
‘you cannot condemn a person to a lifetime of involuntary celibacy.’
Well, obviously, it *can* be done. Perhaps it is unjust, perhaps it is cruel, but it already *has* been done, by the Catholic Church.
Further, I think almost any society would be willing to condemn *someone* to lifelong involuntary celibacy. Suppose someone demands the civil right to have sex with barnyard animals. Many societies would say, “No, we don’t care if that’s your genetically-ingrained preference, we’re not going to let you do that, regardless of how much you suffer from celibacy.”
Every civilization demands some kind of restriction from its inhabitants. For example, if a given society protects the right to be gay, it must also restrict the freedom of non-gays to beat up gays.
zhai2nan2 said:
‘I like the idea of there being nothing sinful about enjoying the pleasures of sex. After all, why should it be sinful???’
Sex is biologically risky, and always has been.
Sex can lead to injuries, infectious diseases, etc.
Pregnancy has always risked the life of the mother.
Dangerous activities are always subject to taboos and restrictions. Societies define “sin” in terms of “danger,” so of course sex is readily classified as “sinful.”
Now, if you want to argue that taboos are primitive, and civilized societies ought to be more free than pre-scientific tribes, many people will agree with that.
Racer X said:
Zhai,
Those are good points. I have always advocated a safe and healthy enjoyment of sexual pleasure. It is a question of degrees. For instance, I think the the prohibition against masturbation in the Catholic Church is a bit outdated. There is nothing really risky about that activity, except when it impedes real relationships with real people.
Butterfly Flower said:
Sounds more to my liking than the dark, ominous tone of so much of Christian theology regarding sex and sexuality. I like the idea of there being nothing sinful about enjoying the pleasures of sex.
Well, it’s worth giving it a shot; especially since the Catholic Church does not consider participating in Shinto rituals/praying at a Shinto shrine a sin:
“[*] http://www.cbcj.catholic.jp/eng/jcn/apr2006.htm
At the meeting it was pointed out that in 1936 the Vatican Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith (the forerunner of the present Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples) issued an instruction permitting Japanese bishops to allow Catholics to participate in “patriotic”ceremonies as well as marriages and funerals at Shinto Shrines. The instruction was not rescinded after the end of the Second World War. Furthermore, one of the catechisms widely used in Japan since the war says that Catholics are permitted to visit Shinto shrines ”
This gets extraordinarily lulzy, when you realize Catholics can sinless-ly honor deified Kamikaze pilots, yet aren’t allowed to use condoms.
Racer X said:
Butterfly,
Thanks for the info, that is quite interesting. I often wonder how the Church functions in a society that has very different religious traditions or customs, such as Japan. But if we look to antiquity, we can see that very often the Church coopted pagan rituals and symbols, in order to better inculturate itself with the society it was trying to convert to Christianity. Even to this day, the Roman Mass has a lot of remnants of ancient Roman religious practice: the use of candles, incense, the procession, the priestly vestments, the liturgical gestures, etc. Most Catholics are blissfully unaware of these things.